And I quote:

I have had a few questions about us disobeying the Supreme Courts decisions, (rightfully so) and equating that to Obama's Disregard for the Law. This is Completely Different than Obamas Complete Disregard for the Constitution. The Constitution clearly covers what we the people have the right to do and encouraged to do when we get an Unlawful Politically motivated Ruling from Unelected Judges. This is my reasoning:
Thomas Jefferson and James Madison were authors of the 1798 Virginia and Kentucky Resolutions, which were acts rejecting lawless federal government actions; when the federal government usurps powers not delegated to it by the People, the Virginia Resolution of December 24, 1798 maintained that the states which are parties to the Constitution "have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them;".
The Kentucky Resolution of November 10, 1798 stated in part that when the "general government" - the federal government - "assumes undelegated powers, its acts are unauthoritative, void, and of no force;"
The federal Fugitive Slave Act of 1850 required that all escaped slaves were, upon capture, to be returned to their masters in slave states, and that government officials and citizens of free states must assist in so doing.
In 1854, the Wisconsin Supreme Court became the only state high court to unanimously declare the Fugitive Slave Act unconstitutional. The Wisconsin Supreme Court rejected the Fugitive Slave Act as unconstitutional under the U.S. Constitution, and repugnant as a violation of Natural Law; following which the U.S. Supreme Court purported to overrule the Wisconsin Supreme Court in the 1859 decision of Ableman v. Booth finding it "constitutional;" and in response to the outrageous and unconstitutional decision of the U.S. Supreme Court, the Wisconsin Legislature passed a series of resolutions denouncing the actions of the U.S. Supreme Court as “an arbitrary act of power ... without authority, void and of no force,” and urging “positive defiance” by the states as the “rightful remedy," and Wisconsin officials refused to obey the U.S. Supreme Court.
After the U.S. Supreme Court issued its opinion, the Wisconsin Supreme Court refused to file the U.S. Supreme Court’s mandate upholding the fugitive slave law; and after more than 155 years, that mandate has never been filed, and other government officials in free states actively nullified the misguided commands of Congress in the Fugitive Slave Act; the U.S. Supreme Court's approval of the Act; as well as the U.S. Supreme Court decision Dred Scott v. Sandford of 1857, as they were a violation the Rule of Law and of Natural Law.
In addition to Wisconsin, the legislatures of Maine, Massachusetts, Connecticut, Rhode Island, and Michigan actively nullified the Fugitive Slave Act and repugnant decisions of the U.S. Supreme Court, by passing "personal liberty" laws, making it nearly impossible to enforce the Fugitive Slave Act in those states.
No matter which branch of the federal government - Executive, Legislative or Judicial - is the source of lawless orders usurping the prerogatives of the People, the Founders and others have left a clear course of action for resisting violations of the Rule of Law and Natural Law.
Federal and State judges across the Nation have usurped powers undelegated to them, and have violated Reason, the Rule of Law and Natural Law by purporting to strike down State laws and acts of the People recognizing and protecting Natural Marriage, and the United States Supreme Court and State Supreme Court does not have unlimited power, but is a court of limited jurisdiction pursuant to Article III, whose interpretive exercise of that jurisdiction may not be read to encroach upon the power to amend the Constitution, which is solely the prerogative of Congress and the States, under Article V;.
the United States Supreme Court is not the sole and final arbiter of the powers of the States under the Ninth and Tenth Amendments, when it acts in an area outside of its jurisdiction.
The Judiciary was created by the Founders to have "neither Force nor Will, but merely judgment; and must ultimately depend upon the aid of the executive arm" and the States, "even for the efficacy of its judgments;" and it is high time that the Court be so reminded!
The United States Supreme Court is not infallible, and has issued lawless decisions which are repulsive to the Constitution and Natural Law; including Scott v. Sandford; Buck v. Bell; Korematsu v. United States; Roe v. Wade; and most recently, Obergefell v. Hodges.
The Governor, in faithful execution of the laws of Oklahoma, shall resist unlawful federal or state court encroachments upon the prerogative of the People of Oklahoma to protect Natural Marriage and the Ten Commandments.
The Attorney General shall defend any Oklahoma government official from any lawsuit regarding Natural Marriage, simultaneously with the Governor's political resistance.